The Program Evaluation KnowledgeBase is an online resource aiding education professionals in understanding the basics of project evaluation in order to properly assess projects and programs. It is organized around three elements to assist educators with their program evaluation.
Guideline: Project size, evaluation purpose, and available resources impact whether internal staff members have the means to conduct the program evaluation or whether engaging an external evaluator is warranted. When selecting an evaluator give thought to the advantages/disadvantages of internal versus external evaluators. With an external evaluator it is important to know their experience as well as the cost of their services. Regardless of the path selected, the evaluator should be part of the evaluation team comprised of applicable internal staff members and stakeholders. Prior to proceeding with the evaluation the organization should determine which approach seems most suited for its needs and the resources.
Approved by the American Evaluation Association membership these principles guide the professional practice of evaluators, and inform evaluation clients and the general public about the principles they can expect to be upheld by professional evaluators.
This guideline authored by the International Development Research Centre provides ideas and suggestions for selecting and managing an evaluation consultant or evaluation team.
This National Center for Mental Health Promotion and Youth Violence Prevention Education Development Center brief summaries the issues associated with hiring an external evaluator.
This report, produced by The Association of Baltimore Area Grantmakers and funded by the Casey Foundation's Funders Evaluation Initiative, is designed for program officers who may be asked to advise grantees about contracting an external evaluator.
Purpose: Planning how to conduct a program evaluation is the essessential the first step. The preparatory thinking involves understanding the program being evaluated, organizing an evaluation team, and determining how to conduct the evaluation. Element 1 outlines the pre-planning tasks.
Purpose: Conducting the evaluation involves designing data collection so the analysis and interpretation will answer the questions the evaluation sets out to resolve. When developing and implementing the evaluation design be flexible to collect and analyze data from many perspectives. The collected data should be attentive to the evaluation questions. Element 2 outlines the tasks associated with implementing the evaluation.
Purpose: The evaluation's findings and recommendation have limited value unless they are shared with the stakeholders and utilized to improve the evaluated program. Using the results to improve the evaluated program and communicating with constituencies are activities that occur in parallel. Element 3 outlines the tasks associated with using the results.